Your design. Your decision. The project record, in order.
An AI assistant for Florida architecture firms. Studio prepares the documents. Quarry gathers the existing record. Legate keeps approved follow-through moving. You design, decide, sign and seal.
System-run work includes human confirmation, approval or sending. Business decisions stay with the firm’s principal.
Film transcript
Before the design, there is a building, a brief, and a record to understand.
Studio turns the city's deficiency notice into a comment log and response letter, in PDF and editable Word. Your AI assistant prepares. The architect reviews and decides. For a client you already serve, Quarry gathers the building's recorded history. Sources, dates and gaps stay visible. Permit coverage is unincorporated Miami-Dade and City of Miami. Regaldi runs eighteen of forty-four recurring processes, prepares sixteen for the licensed professional's decision, and leaves ten with them. System-run work includes human confirmation. Business decisions stay with your principal.
Studio for documents and review notes. Quarry for records. Legate for inquiries and approved follow-through. AI calls need prior express written consent. Regaldi charges a flat fee, with nothing tied to selection or contract awards. You design, decide, sign and seal. Your seal stays under your sole control. Your assistant keeps the record organized.
Regaldi. Regulated. Aligned. Digital.
Start with one workflow.
Regaldi runs 18 of 44 recurring processes, prepares 16 for the licensed professional’s decision, and leaves 10 with them.
- Runs with confirmation
- 18
- Prepares for the architect
- 16
- Architect or principal
- 10
- Recurring processes
- 44
Processes each tool runs or prepares; a process two tools share counts for both. Process assignments, not a percentage of labor eliminated. Each process and its tool
In short
Regaldi LLC is a Florida software company that gives architecture firms an AI assistant for the project record around the design. Regaldi Studio prepares plan-review comment logs, response drafts and project documents in PDF and Word, Quarry gathers the existing record for a property with its sources and gaps, and Legate keeps approved follow-through moving. Of the 44 recurring processes mapped for an architecture firm, Regaldi runs 18 with a person at the firm confirming, prepares 16 for the architect’s decision, and leaves 10 with the architect or principal, including fee and scope, design decisions, code and zoning determinations, and signing and sealing. Regaldi holds no architecture license and never uses a seal. Files stay in the firm’s working folder; content read for a task passes through Regaldi’s server to the AI provider, currently Anthropic or OpenAI. Work starts with one workflow and a written scope.
Related professionsInterior design studiosEngineering inspectionsContractorsAll industries
Turn the deficiency notice into organized work.
Studio prepares a comment log and response letter in PDF and editable Word from the city’s notice and your exported project files.
The architect decides the response and any design change. Each draft stays subject to review and adoption.
The notice’s receipt date and the applicable revision deadline are shown with their source (§553.792(1)(f), F.S.). Not every review letter starts the same statutory clock, and drafting does not obtain a permit.
Code references are citations from the notice, not determinations by the assistant. No drawing or sealed file is changed.
Start with the building’s recorded history.
For a client you already serve, Quarry gathers parcel facts, permit history, failed-inspection records where matched, violations and City of Miami recertification records, with dates, sources and gaps.
- Failed inspections: no verified parcel match in this demonstration. The feed has no folio.
- Code cases and violation liens: outside the verified county feed’s jurisdiction for this city parcel.
- Planning applications, milestone status and tax status: not collected. Lien linkage: incomplete.
Keep the record behind your decisions.
Studio organizes meeting minutes, communications, research, staged design files and review notes across the life of the project.
- 01 · Studio Meeting Minutes with date, attendees and the source recording, made only with every participant’s consent.
- 02 · Architect Decision The architect’s decision, identified as the architect’s.
- 03 · Studio Review note Reviewer, date, source and the unresolved action.
- 04 · Studio Project record Filed under the firm’s retention plan and holds; sealed files kept unchanged.
Rule 61G1-23.015 identifies these records as evidence of responsible supervising control. Your supervision remains personal and undelegable.
Recordings require every participant’s consent. The assistant does not invent site observations, substitute a log for supervision or promise protection from a complaint. Retention follows the firm’s plan and applicable holds; no fixed Board retention period is asserted.
Track the date that determines the code edition.
The 9th Edition Florida Building Code takes effect December 31, 2026.
Project jurisdiction sheet
- Jurisdiction
- As recorded for the project
- Application date
- From the submitted application
- Source notice
- The jurisdiction’s published notice
- Code edition
- Architect review required
Studio keeps the jurisdiction, application date and code-edition record together. Your architect determines the provisions that apply (§553.73, F.S.).
44 recurring processes. A named tool. A clear decision owner.
Regaldi runs 18, prepares 16 for the architect’s decision, and leaves 10 with the architect or principal. Every system-run and prepared cell names its tool; the others name the person who decides.
- System runs it
- 18
- System prepares it
- 16
- Architect or principal
- 10
- Processes mapped
- 44
- Studio29
- Quarry2
- Legate10
- A process two tools share counts for both; the tool totals overlap. Radar and Herald carry none.
- S · System runs it. A person confirms, approves or sends.
- P · System prepares it. The architect decides.
- H · Architect or principal. The architect or principal performs the decision or act.
Hover, focus or tap a process to see what the system does. Scope conditions print on the cell.
Inquiries, proposals and agreements
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Inbound requests from the website, email, phone forms and referrals are logged; the AI assistant says it is automated and stays within the requested channel. No design, code or cost opinion.Tool: LegateTCPA; FCC 24-17
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Program, budget range, schedule, address and existing documents are collected and missing inputs listed.Tool: Legate · Studio
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Sourced possible conflicts are flagged. The architect decides and makes any required written disclosure.Tool: StudioRule 61G1-12.001, F.A.C.
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The system lays out the inputs. The principal sets fee, phases, scope, exclusions and terms.Held by: Principal
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Drafted from the firm’s own forms and approved terms in PDF and Word, for the principal to review and adopt.Tool: StudioRule 61G1-23.010(2)(b), F.A.C.; §558.0035, F.S.
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The principal signs through the firm’s own system; the software records the version and date. No e-signature connector.Held by: Principal
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Agreed follow-ups are prepared for approval and the client’s decision recorded. Opt-outs are respected.Tool: LegateCAN-SPAM
Existing conditions and project setup
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Records for a client the firm already serves, with sources, record dates, observed dates, coverage and linkage gaps. Never an owner list.Tool: Quarry · StudioExisting clients only
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Client material is indexed and agency records requests drafted. Exempt plans and client confidences are preserved.Tool: Studio§119.071(3)(b), F.S.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Jurisdiction, application date and source edition are recorded. The architect determines which provisions apply.Tool: Studio§553.73(7), F.S.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. The folder and the sheet register are kept from the firm’s exported sets.Tool: Studio
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Proposals compared, scopes drafted and each consultant’s license checked with its own board: engineers on FBPE records, surveyors and mappers on FDACS records. The architect selects and coordinates consultants.Tool: Studio · Legate
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The system files the sourced research. The architect determines occupancy, construction type, egress, accessibility and zoning compliance.Held by: Architect§481.203(2), F.S.; Rule 61G1-23.010, F.A.C.
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Sourced research and open questions prepared for the architect to adopt or revise.Tool: StudioRule 61G1-23.015(1)(d), F.A.C.
Design and documents
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The architect makes the design decisions; the software keeps the decision record.Held by: ArchitectRule 61G1-23.010, F.A.C.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Decisions, actions and review notes are filed. Meetings are recorded only with every participant’s consent.Tool: StudioRule 61G1-23.015(1)(b), F.A.C.; §934.03, F.S.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Approved phase-gate requests are prepared and client replies filed. The client keeps direct access to the architect.Tool: LegateRule 61G1-23.010(2)(a)1, F.A.C.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Due dates, exported backgrounds and returned sets are tracked. Coordination judgments stay human.Tool: Studio · Legate
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Drafted from the office masters and the products the architect chose. The architect reviews the specifications and any supplier conflict.Tool: Studio
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Exported text, title blocks, sheet references and dates are checked. No geometry measurement and no drawing edits.Tool: StudioExported PDF text onlyRule 61G1-16.004, F.A.C.
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Forms the professionals supply are assembled and checked for consistency. No energy calculation and no accessibility determination.Tool: Studio
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. Only the architect signs, dates and seals. The credentials stay under the architect’s sole control; the system never holds or applies them.Held by: Architect§481.221, F.S.; Rule 61G1-16.005, F.A.C.
Permits and plan review
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Forms and attachments prepared for review in the firm’s browser, each submission confirmed by a person. No portal adapter.Tool: StudioEach submit confirmed§553.79(1)(b), F.S.
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The architect releases the unchanged sealed set; the firm or contractor submits under its own login.Held by: Architect§481.221(2), F.S.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Cited comments and the applicable notice deadlines are logged with their sources and confirmed by the firm.Tool: Studio§553.792(1)(f), F.S.
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. The response letter and log are prepared in PDF and Word; architect decisions and consultant answers stay open until supplied.Tool: Studio§553.792(1)(f), F.S.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Supported permit status changes and expirations are flagged; other cities are checked in the firm’s own browser.Tool: Quarry · Studio
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Supplied drawings, narrative and checklist are assembled. Planning applications are not collected.Tool: Studio
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The responsible architect or engineer prepares the structural inspection plan; the software tracks its status.Held by: Architect or engineer§553.79, F.S.
Construction administration
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Received dates, due dates, reviewer and status are logged, without any review decision.Tool: Studio
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. The relevant sheets, specifications and prior answers are gathered for an architect-reviewed response.Tool: Studio
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Listed requirements are compared and missing material flagged. No professional review action.Tool: Studio
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The architect or the responsible consultant decides the submittal or shop-drawing action.Held by: Architect or consultant
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Drafted only from the architect’s actual observations, photos and notes; the architect edits and issues. No invented observation.Tool: StudioRule 61G1-23.015, F.A.C.
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. Change documents are drafted; the architect judges the effects and the owner decides scope, cost and time.Tool: Studio
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The architect certifies payment and determines substantial or final completion. A software review is not professional approval.Held by: Architect§481.203(2), F.S.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Warranties, manuals, as-built submissions and inspection records are requested and indexed.Tool: Studio · Legate
Firm, records and new business
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Verified licenses, the firm’s qualification with the Board, changes and education records are tracked. A missing registry result proves nothing by itself.Tool: Legate§481.219, F.S.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Invoices are prepared from agreements and time records; reminders need approval and lawful collection conduct.Tool: Legate · Studio
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Records are indexed throughout the project under the firm’s retention plan and holds. Sealed files are kept unchanged.Tool: StudioRule 61G1-23.015, F.A.C.
- The architect or principal performs the decision or act. The system keeps the record. The system records the evidence and the applicable deadlines. The principal and counsel handle claims, Chapter 558 notices and Board complaints.Held by: Principal · counselCh. 558, F.S.
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. License-number, firm-name, project-role and image-rights issues are flagged for the principal to approve.Tool: StudioRule 61G1-12.001(2), (3), F.A.C.
- The system runs it; a person confirms, approves or sends. Agreed contact with clients and partners, with approvals and opt-outs. No reward for selection.Tool: LegateCAN-SPAM; §720.3033(3), F.S.
- The system prepares it; the architect decides. The firm’s own qualifications are prepared from its project records; the principal submits. No retained contract solicitation.Tool: Studio§287.055(6), F.S.
Read the whole map as a list
| No. | Process | Who carries it | Tool or holder | Work and review boundary | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inquiries, proposals and agreements | |||||
| 01 | Inquiries | System runs it | Legate | Inbound requests from the website, email, phone forms and referrals are logged; the AI assistant says it is automated and stays within the requested channel. No design, code or cost opinion. | TCPA; FCC 24-17 Details |
| 02 | Client intake questionnaire | System runs it | Legate · Studio | Program, budget range, schedule, address and existing documents are collected and missing inputs listed. | Details |
| 03 | Conflict-of-interest check | System prepares it | Studio | Sourced possible conflicts are flagged. The architect decides and makes any required written disclosure. | Rule 61G1-12.001, F.A.C. Details |
| 04 | Fee and scope decision | Architect or principal | Principal | The system lays out the inputs. The principal sets fee, phases, scope, exclusions and terms. | Details |
| 05 | Proposal and agreement draft | System prepares it | Studio | Drafted from the firm’s own forms and approved terms in PDF and Word, for the principal to review and adopt. | Rule 61G1-23.010(2)(b), F.A.C.; §558.0035, F.S. Details |
| 06 | Agreement signature | Architect or principal | Principal | The principal signs through the firm’s own system; the software records the version and date. No e-signature connector. | Details |
| 07 | Proposal follow-up | System runs it | Legate | Agreed follow-ups are prepared for approval and the client’s decision recorded. Opt-outs are respected. | CAN-SPAM Details |
| Existing conditions and project setup | |||||
| 08 | Existing-conditions packetExisting clients only | System runs it | Quarry · Studio | Records for a client the firm already serves, with sources, record dates, observed dates, coverage and linkage gaps. Never an owner list. | Details |
| 09 | Client documents and records requests | System runs it | Studio | Client material is indexed and agency records requests drafted. Exempt plans and client confidences are preserved. | §119.071(3)(b), F.S. Details |
| 10 | Code edition and jurisdiction sheet | System runs it | Studio | Jurisdiction, application date and source edition are recorded. The architect determines which provisions apply. | §553.73(7), F.S. Details |
| 11 | Project folder and sheet register | System runs it | Studio | The folder and the sheet register are kept from the firm’s exported sets. | Details |
| 12 | Consultant scopes and license checks | System prepares it | Studio · Legate | Proposals compared, scopes drafted and each consultant’s license checked with its own board: engineers on FBPE records, surveyors and mappers on FDACS records. The architect selects and coordinates consultants. | Details |
| 13 | Code and zoning determinations | Architect or principal | Architect | The system files the sourced research. The architect determines occupancy, construction type, egress, accessibility and zoning compliance. | §481.203(2), F.S.; Rule 61G1-23.010, F.A.C. Details |
| 14 | Code and zoning research notes | System prepares it | Studio | Sourced research and open questions prepared for the architect to adopt or revise. | Rule 61G1-23.015(1)(d), F.A.C. Details |
| Design and documents | |||||
| 15 | Design decisions | Architect or principal | Architect | The architect makes the design decisions; the software keeps the decision record. | Rule 61G1-23.010, F.A.C. Details |
| 16 | Meeting minutes and decision log | System runs it | Studio | Decisions, actions and review notes are filed. Meetings are recorded only with every participant’s consent. | Rule 61G1-23.015(1)(b), F.A.C.; §934.03, F.S. Details |
| 17 | Client approvals at phase gates | System runs it | Legate | Approved phase-gate requests are prepared and client replies filed. The client keeps direct access to the architect. | Rule 61G1-23.010(2)(a)1, F.A.C. Details |
| 18 | Consultant coordination and transmittals | System runs it | Studio · Legate | Due dates, exported backgrounds and returned sets are tracked. Coordination judgments stay human. | Details |
| 19 | Specifications from office masters | System prepares it | Studio | Drafted from the office masters and the products the architect chose. The architect reviews the specifications and any supplier conflict. | Details |
| 20 | Drawing-set checkExported PDF text only | System prepares it | Studio | Exported text, title blocks, sheet references and dates are checked. No geometry measurement and no drawing edits. | Rule 61G1-16.004, F.A.C. Details |
| 21 | Energy and accessibility documents | System prepares it | Studio | Forms the professionals supply are assembled and checked for consistency. No energy calculation and no accessibility determination. | Details |
| 22 | Signing and sealing | Architect or principal | Architect | Only the architect signs, dates and seals. The credentials stay under the architect’s sole control; the system never holds or applies them. | §481.221, F.S.; Rule 61G1-16.005, F.A.C. Details |
| Permits and plan review | |||||
| 23 | Permit application packageEach submit confirmed | System prepares it | Studio | Forms and attachments prepared for review in the firm’s browser, each submission confirmed by a person. No portal adapter. | §553.79(1)(b), F.S. Details |
| 24 | Release of the sealed set | Architect or principal | Architect | The architect releases the unchanged sealed set; the firm or contractor submits under its own login. | §481.221(2), F.S. Details |
| 25 | Plan-review comment log | System runs it | Studio | Cited comments and the applicable notice deadlines are logged with their sources and confirmed by the firm. | §553.792(1)(f), F.S. Details |
| 26 | Comment response drafts | System prepares it | Studio | The response letter and log are prepared in PDF and Word; architect decisions and consultant answers stay open until supplied. | §553.792(1)(f), F.S. Details |
| 27 | Permit status tracking | System runs it | Quarry · Studio | Supported permit status changes and expirations are flagged; other cities are checked in the firm’s own browser. | Details |
| 28 | Hearing and board packages | System prepares it | Studio | Supplied drawings, narrative and checklist are assembled. Planning applications are not collected. | Details |
| 29 | Threshold inspection plan | Architect or principal | Architect or engineer | The responsible architect or engineer prepares the structural inspection plan; the software tracks its status. | §553.79, F.S. Details |
| Construction administration | |||||
| 30 | RFI, submittal and instruction logs | System runs it | Studio | Received dates, due dates, reviewer and status are logged, without any review decision. | Details |
| 31 | RFI response drafts | System prepares it | Studio | The relevant sheets, specifications and prior answers are gathered for an architect-reviewed response. | Details |
| 32 | Submittal review preparation | System prepares it | Studio | Listed requirements are compared and missing material flagged. No professional review action. | Details |
| 33 | Submittal review action | Architect or principal | Architect or consultant | The architect or the responsible consultant decides the submittal or shop-drawing action. | Details |
| 34 | Field observation reports | System prepares it | Studio | Drafted only from the architect’s actual observations, photos and notes; the architect edits and issues. No invented observation. | Rule 61G1-23.015, F.A.C. Details |
| 35 | Change documents | System prepares it | Studio | Change documents are drafted; the architect judges the effects and the owner decides scope, cost and time. | Details |
| 36 | Payment and completion | Architect or principal | Architect | The architect certifies payment and determines substantial or final completion. A software review is not professional approval. | §481.203(2), F.S. Details |
| 37 | Close-out documents | System runs it | Studio · Legate | Warranties, manuals, as-built submissions and inspection records are requested and indexed. | Details |
| Firm, records and new business | |||||
| 38 | Licenses, qualification and education | System runs it | Legate | Verified licenses, the firm’s qualification with the Board, changes and education records are tracked. A missing registry result proves nothing by itself. | §481.219, F.S. Details |
| 39 | Invoicing and payment follow-up | System runs it | Legate · Studio | Invoices are prepared from agreements and time records; reminders need approval and lawful collection conduct. | Details |
| 40 | Project record and archive | System runs it | Studio | Records are indexed throughout the project under the firm’s retention plan and holds. Sealed files are kept unchanged. | Rule 61G1-23.015, F.A.C. Details |
| 41 | Claims, 558 notices and complaints | Architect or principal | Principal · counsel | The system records the evidence and the applicable deadlines. The principal and counsel handle claims, Chapter 558 notices and Board complaints. | Ch. 558, F.S. Details |
| 42 | Advertising and portfolio check | System prepares it | Studio | License-number, firm-name, project-role and image-rights issues are flagged for the principal to approve. | Rule 61G1-12.001(2), (3), F.A.C. Details |
| 43 | Past clients and referral partners | System runs it | Legate | Agreed contact with clients and partners, with approvals and opt-outs. No reward for selection. | CAN-SPAM; §720.3033(3), F.S. Details |
| 44 | Public-sector qualification submittals | System prepares it | Studio | The firm’s own qualifications are prepared from its project records; the principal submits. No retained contract solicitation. | §287.055(6), F.S. Details |
These are workflow responsibility counts, not 44 connectors, autonomous licensed services or a measurement of time saved. For business matters the principal is the decision owner, with counsel on claims and contract issues; responsible consultants keep their own professional judgments.
Your judgment. Your signature. Your seal.
Only the architect designs, makes code and zoning determinations, signs and seals.
Regaldi LLC is a Florida software company. It holds no architecture license and does not practise architecture or engineering. Its AI assistant never calls itself an architect. Prepared work remains inside the firm’s supervised workflow. The architect reviews, modifies, approves and adopts it as appropriate.
- Personal supervising control
The architect directs and reviews the work personally; the record shows that participation, it does not replace it.
- Review and adoption
Every prepared draft is reviewed, modified, approved and adopted by the architect, or set aside.
- Seal under sole control
The seal and digital signature stay with the architect alone; the system never holds or applies them.
The system never stores, forwards or applies the architect’s seal or digital signature, never holds the signing certificate, and never edits a sealed file. The architect alone controls signing and sealing. The architect releases the sealed set; the firm or contractor submits under its own login.
Studio works with the PDFs and files your firm exports. Drawing checks are text-level checks. It does not measure vector geometry or dimensions, mark up the PDF, drive drawing applications or provide a CAD/BIM connector. There is no permit-portal adapter or agreement e-signature connector. Browser actions use approved access and each submit requires confirmation.
-
04 Fee and scope decision Principal
Rule 61G1-23.010(2)(b), F.A.C.- What the rule places with the professional
- The work to be done is described in a written agreement. The principal sets the fee, phases, scope, exclusions and terms.
- What the system does around it
- The system lays out the inputs. The principal sets fee, phases, scope, exclusions and terms.
-
06 Agreement signature Principal
Rule 61G1-23.010(2)(b), F.A.C.- What the rule places with the professional
- The principal signs the agreement through the firm’s own system. There is no e-signature connector.
- What the system does around it
- The principal signs through the firm’s own system; the software records the version and date. No e-signature connector.
-
13 Code and zoning determinations Architect
§481.203(2), F.S.- What the rule places with the professional
- Architecture includes planning, design, drawings and specifications. Occupancy, construction type, egress, accessibility and zoning compliance are the architect’s determinations.
- What the system does around it
- The system files the sourced research. The architect determines occupancy, construction type, egress, accessibility and zoning compliance.
-
15 Design decisions Architect
Rule 61G1-23.010, F.A.C.- What the rule places with the professional
- Responsible supervising control requires the architect’s direct participation in the design. Design decisions stay with the architect.
- What the system does around it
- The architect makes the design decisions; the software keeps the decision record.
-
22 Signing and sealing Architect
§481.221, F.S.- What the rule places with the professional
- Final documents filed for public record bear the signature, seal and date of the architect who prepared or approved them. A digital signature must be under the sole control of the person using it (Rule 61G1-16.005, F.A.C.).
- What the system does around it
- Only the architect signs, dates and seals. The credentials stay under the architect’s sole control; the system never holds or applies them.
-
24 Release of the sealed set Architect
§481.221(2), F.S.- What the rule places with the professional
- The architect releases the unchanged sealed set. The firm or contractor submits under its own login.
- What the system does around it
- The architect releases the unchanged sealed set; the firm or contractor submits under its own login.
-
29 Threshold inspection plan Architect or engineer
§553.79, F.S.- What the rule places with the professional
- For a threshold building, the responsible architect or engineer prepares the structural inspection plan.
- What the system does around it
- The responsible architect or engineer prepares the structural inspection plan; the software tracks its status.
-
33 Submittal review action Architect or consultant
§481.203(2), F.S.- What the rule places with the professional
- Administration of construction contracts is part of architecture. The architect or responsible consultant decides each submittal or shop-drawing action.
- What the system does around it
- The architect or the responsible consultant decides the submittal or shop-drawing action.
-
36 Payment and completion Architect
§481.203(2), F.S.- What the rule places with the professional
- The architect certifies payment and determines substantial or final completion. A software review is not professional approval.
- What the system does around it
- The architect certifies payment and determines substantial or final completion. A software review is not professional approval.
-
41 Claims, 558 notices and complaints Principal · counsel
Ch. 558, F.S.- What the rule places with the professional
- Chapter 558 notices, claims and Board complaints go to the principal and counsel, with dates tracked from the actual matter.
- What the system does around it
- The system records the evidence and the applicable deadlines. The principal and counsel handle claims, Chapter 558 notices and Board complaints.
Read Chapter 481, Part I, §481.223, Rule 61G1-23.010, Rule 61G1-23.015 and Rule 61G1-16.005 in full. The client keeps direct access to the architect. General information, not legal advice.
Responsibilities and limits
The boundaries each workflow keeps, by topic. Each process on the map links here.
Responsible supervising control§§481.203, 481.223, F.S.; Rules 61G1-23.010, 61G1-23.015, F.A.C.
Regaldi LLC holds no architecture license and does not practise architecture or engineering, and its AI assistant never calls itself an architect. Prepared work stays inside the firm’s supervised workflow; the architect reviews, modifies, approves and adopts it as appropriate, and supervision remains personal and undelegable. The client keeps direct access to the architect.
Rule 61G1-23.015 names project records as evidence of responsible supervising control: agreements, meeting records, communications, research, design sketches and review notations. The assistant does not invent site observations, substitute a log for supervision or promise protection from a complaint. Existing statutory exemptions for some buildings do not create an AI practice exemption; where an architect’s seal is required, the supervising-control rules apply.
Signature and seal§481.221, F.S.; Rules 61G1-16.003, 61G1-16.005, F.A.C.
The system never stores, forwards or applies the architect’s seal or digital signature, never holds the signing certificate and never edits a sealed file. The architect alone controls signing and sealing. The architect releases the sealed set; the firm or contractor submits under its own login.
Files and drawingsProduct scope, October 14, 2026; Rule 61G1-16.004, F.A.C.
Studio works with the PDFs and files your firm exports. Drawing checks are text-level checks: title-block fields, sheet references and dates. It does not measure vector geometry or dimensions, mark up the PDF, drive drawing applications or provide a CAD/BIM connector. There is no permit-portal adapter or agreement e-signature connector. Browser actions use approved access and each submit requires confirmation.
Existing-conditions researchQuarry coverage notes, October 14, 2026
Research for an existing project: not a survey, zoning determination, title search or engineering opinion, and an empty result does not prove that no record exists. Permits: unincorporated Miami-Dade and the City of Miami. Code and building violations: unincorporated Miami-Dade. Recertification: City of Miami, per parcel. Other cities require the firm’s own portal research.
Inspection feeds carry failed or correction-required results without a folio, and violation liens also lack one; neither is attached to a parcel without a checked match. Recertification status may be years old, so event and observation dates stay separate, and a daily collection run does not make the underlying record current. Planning applications and milestone-inspection status are not collected; flood zones, setbacks, zoning interpretation, surveys and old drawing retrieval are not Quarry capabilities. No owner outreach list is built from violations, unsafe structures, failed recertifications, special assessments or storm damage.
Permits, plan review and code editions§§553.73, 553.79, 553.792, F.S.
The architect decides the response to a plan-review notice and any design change; drafts stay subject to review and adoption. The receipt date and the applicable revision deadline are shown with their source, and not every review letter starts the same statutory clock. Drafting does not obtain a permit.
The edition of the Florida Building Code in effect on the date of application governs the permitted work. Studio keeps the jurisdiction, application date and code-edition record together; the architect determines the provisions that apply. Energy and accessibility work is document assembly and consistency checking, without compliance calculations or scope determinations.
Agreements, conflicts and specifications§§558.0035, 725.08, 287.055(6), F.S.; Rule 61G1-12.001, F.A.C.
Conflicts need the architect’s review and written disclosure where they apply. The principal chooses consultant scopes and agreement terms, using the firm’s own forms. Where the firm uses §558.0035 language its prominence and formatting are kept; public-agency terms keep the §725.08 limits and the §287.055(6) clause. Copyright and license provisions go to the principal, with counsel as appropriate.
Specifications use the firm’s masters and the architect’s chosen products, with no undisclosed supplier consideration or contractor gratuity. Engineering beyond purely incidental services stays with the appropriately licensed professional.
Construction administration§481.203(2), §553.79, F.S.
Threshold-building structural inspection plans and sealed code statements belong to the responsible architect or engineer. Submittal actions, payment certification, completion determinations, and scope, cost and time judgments stay with their responsible people. A software review is not professional approval, and field reports are drafted only from the architect’s actual observations.
Advertising and portfolio§481.225(1)(f), F.S.; Rule 61G1-12.001(2), (3), F.A.C.
The qualifier’s license number belongs in firm advertising, and the firm’s name is used with “architect”, “architecture” or “architectural”. The firm’s role in past work is not exaggerated and no outcome is promised. A photograph of publicly visible architecture and the photographer’s rights are separate questions; actual project images are used with rights cleared.
Calls, texts and emailTCPA; FCC 24-17; §§501.059, 501.616(6), 934.03, F.S.; CAN-SPAM
AI or automated voice calls and automated texts require prior express written consent; an inquiry, a public listing or an existing business relationship alone does not replace it. The assistant discloses that it is automated. National, Florida and internal do-not-call lists are checked, calls stay within 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. at the recipient’s location and Florida’s frequency limits, recording requires every party’s consent, and STOP and revocation are honored promptly. No cold AI calls.
Email uses accurate sender details, the firm’s postal address and a working opt-out honored within 10 business days, with immediate suppression as the operating policy. The firm approves outgoing messages and truthful advertising.
Referrals and public pursuits§287.055(6), F.S.; Rule 61G1-12.001(6)(b), F.A.C.; §720.3033(3), F.S.
Regaldi charges a flat fee for software and services and pays and takes nothing for referrals. Nothing depends on selection, professional fees, project wins or public-contract awards. No bribe, commission or gift to obtain selection, and association officers and managers receive no kickbacks.
Public pursuits stay inside the firm: Studio prepares the firm’s own qualifications materials, and the principal decides and submits. Regaldi is not retained to solicit or secure a public contract. Selection follows qualifications, with compensation discussed during competitive negotiations. Flat fees do not remove the separate restriction on retained solicitors.
Licenses and firm qualification§481.219, F.S.
License tracking uses the firm’s qualification with the Board and actual registry records. The 30-day change notifications and the 60-day sole-qualifier replacement rule are kept distinct. Continuing-education quantities in the research are secondary evidence and are not presented as a verified renewal rule. Consultant checks use the licensing board of each profession: FBPE for engineers, and FDACS for surveyors and mappers (§472.007, F.S.); a missing result proves nothing by itself.
Claims, complaints and collectionsCh. 558, F.S.; §95.11(3), F.S.
Claims, Chapter 558 notices and Board complaints go to the principal and counsel, with notice, inspection and response dates tracked from the actual matter. Limitation and repose periods do not set a universal deletion schedule; retention and litigation holds follow the firm’s plan. Payment follow-up complies with applicable collection rules: no harassment and no invented debt consequence.
Data and confidentiality§119.071(3)(b), F.S.; Rule 61G1-12.001(6)(h), F.A.C.
Files stay in the firm’s working folder, and the firm chooses the folders and supported accounts the assistant may use. Content the assistant reads for a task passes through Regaldi’s server to the AI provider, currently Anthropic or OpenAI; conversation memory and uploaded attachments are stored on Regaldi’s server under written terms covering access, retention and deletion.
One firm’s drawings are never used for another firm. Client confidences are preserved, and agency-provided exempt plans keep their exempt status. Keeping sealed files as unchanged project records grants no access to signing credentials. No local-only processing, zero-retention, certification or SOC 2 claim.
Measure the work around the design.
Use your volumes to estimate administrative workload, then choose one workflow to measure.
≈ modeled hours per week
About of team hours a week under the comparison assumption. Workload selected for evaluation: about hours.
(5 inquiries × 20 min + 10 projects × 120 min) ÷ 60 + 4 review rounds × 12 ÷ 50 weeks × 4 h = 25.5 hours a week; × 40.9% = 10.4 selected for evaluation
An estimate from the assumptions shown, not a measurement of your firm or a promise of time saved, staffing reductions, permits or new projects.
Prepare the next conversation.
Organize inquiries and approved partner follow-ups. The firm keeps the relationship and the selection process.
Find
LegateInbound inquiries, agreed past-client contact, received association RFPs and public announcements.
Contractors, engineers, interior designers, realtors, association managers and lenders.
Inbound and business search. No distress-based owner lists; a business listing is not consent to an AI call.
Research
Quarry · Studio · LegateAn existing-conditions packet for a client the firm already has.
Public business records and each consultant’s license on its own board: FBPE for engineers, FDACS for surveyors and mappers.
No survey or zoning opinion; a missing registry result proves nothing by itself.
Write
StudioProposal and qualifications drafts from the firm’s real work.
Approved introductions from the firm’s mailbox.
Actual project role, image rights, the qualifier’s license number and accurate firm identity; email opt-out rules apply.
Call
LegateA consent-gated callback to arrange a meeting with the architect.
A call to a partner with prior express written consent; first contact can be an approved letter or email.
The AI assistant identifies itself; suppression lists and calling hours apply; all-party consent before recording. No cold AI calls.
Follow up
LegateRecord the reply and the approved next action.
Keep a history of introductions, replies and the agreed next contact.
Stop on revocation or refusal; opt-outs honored.
Present
StudioScope, phases, fee and agreement draft approved by the principal.
A capability sheet from real projects and licensed people.
The principal sets fee and scope; actual project images with rights cleared.
Close
Principal · Studio · LegateThe principal signs through the firm’s own system and records the source.
Record and acknowledge a referral without paying for selection.
Recordkeeping only. No commission, gift, award fee or association kickback.
AI or automated voice calls and automated texts require prior express written consent. An inquiry, public listing or existing business relationship alone does not replace it. The assistant discloses that it is automated. National, Florida and internal do-not-call lists are checked, calls stay within 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. at the recipient’s location and Florida’s frequency limits, recording requires every party’s consent, and STOP and revocation are honored promptly.
Email uses accurate sender details, the firm’s postal address and a working opt-out honored within 10 business days, with immediate suppression as the operating policy. The firm approves outgoing messages and truthful advertising.
The qualifier’s license number belongs in firm advertising, and the firm’s name is used with “architect”, “architecture” or “architectural”. The firm’s role in past work is not exaggerated and no outcome is promised.
Public pursuits stay inside the firm. Studio prepares the firm’s own qualifications; the principal decides and submits. Regaldi is not retained to solicit or secure a public contract, and a flat fee does not remove the separate restriction on retained solicitors (§287.055(6), F.S.).
Regaldi charges a flat fee for software and services. It pays and takes nothing for referrals. Nothing depends on selection, professional fees, project wins or public-contract awards. No bribe, commission or gift to obtain selection; association officers and managers receive no kickbacks. Details
The tools around your practice.
Studio prepares. Quarry researches. Legate follows through with approval.
StudioPrepares the documents · 29 processes
- PDF and Word
Comment logs, response letters, proposals, minutes, specifications and field reports as PDF and editable Word drafts.
- Exported files and working folder
The PDFs and files the firm exports, read in the folder you choose. Text-level checks only; no drawing application is driven and nothing sealed is edited.
- Minutes, research and review notes
The project record behind your decisions, each item with its date, author or reviewer, source and open action.
- Supported computer use
With approved access the assistant works in the firm’s browser, clicks and types, and records each action. Each submit requires confirmation.
QuarryResearches the existing record · 2 processes
- Parcel facts
Source-linked parcel facts for the supported area, with missing values kept, for a client the firm already serves.
- Permit history
Permits in unincorporated Miami-Dade and the City of Miami, failed-inspection records where matched, and City of Miami recertification per parcel.
- Dated sources and gaps
Record dates and observed dates kept apart, sources named, and gaps such as planning applications and milestone status stated plainly.
LegateFollows through with approval · 10 processes
- Inquiry records
Inbound inquiries and client replies with their history and channel permissions.
- Consultant license checks
Each consultant checked with the board that licenses them, engineers with FBPE and surveyors and mappers with FDACS, and the result saved. A missing result proves nothing by itself.
- Approved follow-up
Phase-gate requests, proposal follow-up and partner contact, each approved before it goes, with opt-outs kept.
Tool totals overlap and are not summed into a new process count. Herald has no architect workflow and carries no process.
An architecture-specific Radar is in development. We will show its coverage and evidence when verified.
No cards, volumes, scores, map pins, lead counts or delivery promises are shown. Quarry’s existing-project research above stays separate from Radar.
Set the access. Keep the record confidential.
Agree the working folders, review owners and data terms before the assistant starts.
- The firm’s computerThe working folderstays here
- Regaldi’s serverPasses the task contentstores memory and uploads
- AI providerAnthropic or OpenAIprocesses what the assistant reads for a task
- Working files
- Files stay in your firm’s working folder. You choose the folders and supported accounts the assistant may use.
- Task processing
- Content the assistant reads for a task passes through Regaldi’s server to the AI provider, currently Anthropic or OpenAI.
- Stored data
- Conversation memory and uploaded attachments are stored on Regaldi’s server under written terms covering access, retention and deletion.
- Client material
- One firm’s drawings are never used for another firm. Client confidences are preserved. Agency-provided exempt plans keep their exempt status.
- Review
- Review sources and drafts before relying on them. AI output can be wrong.
- Claims not made
- No local-only processing, zero retention, certification or SOC 2 claim. Keeping sealed files unchanged grants no access to signing credentials.
Start with one workflow.
Choose the task, agree the review owner, and evaluate the work with your team.
- 01 · DiagnosticTwo to three weeks
Scope
The comment-response letter and log, an existing-conditions packet or the meeting record, with permissions, sources, baseline and a fixed scope.
Credited once toward the project.
- 02 · PilotOne process
Prepare
The first drafts and records prepared for the architect’s review, with corrections recorded.
Where a question remains open after the diagnostic.
- 03 · BuildIn stages
Review
Accuracy, correction effort and approval handling reviewed before any expansion.
There are no measured architect outcomes to cite; the first workflow records the real baseline.
Flat-fee software and services. No payment tied to selection, project wins or public-contract awards. Regaldi pays and receives nothing for referrals.
The scope of each stage is agreed in writing. A flat fee does not make Regaldi an architect or authorize contract solicitation. Regaldi reports what it observes and its limits; it does not promise results.
Prices: regaldi.ai/pricing/
Bring one recurring task
Tell Ita how your firm works and which task you want to organize. A principal reads every inquiry and writes back by email. Do not include client details, confidential drawings, signing credentials or passwords.
An inquiry is not consent to AI marketing calls. Any later call-consent request is separate, optional and specific.
Do not include patient information, client files or passwords. Sending this does not purchase a service. Your message is relayed to office@regaldi.ai through FormSubmit; our Privacy Policy applies.
Regaldi LLC is a Florida software company and holds no architecture license. General information, not legal advice. Each firm remains responsible for Chapter 481, the Board’s rules, the Florida Building Code and local requirements. The rule summaries on this page are simplified; read the full texts linked here. AI output can be inaccurate and must be reviewed by the responsible professional before it is relied on.